… E race. Justice K Lakshman also extended the interim orders prohibiting an arrest till the court gave its judgement. Earlier, senior advocate …
Telangana High Court hears KTR’s quash petition in Formula E race case
Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court began hearing the quash petition filed by Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) working president K.T. Rama Rao in …
US Federal Appeals Court Upholds $5 Million Verdict against Donald Trump in E Jean Carroll Case
Following a nine-day civil trial in New York last year, a jury found Trump guilty of sexual abuse, awarding Carroll $2 million in damages, and an …
Formula-E case: Telangana High Court reserves judgement on KTR’s quash petition
Earlier, senior advocate Siddhartha Dave, appearing for Rama Rao, argued that there was no evidence of any misappropriation of funds in the case.
Appeals Court Upholds $5 Million E. Jean Carroll Verdict Against Donald Trump – video Dailymotion
Carroll’s lawsuit accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in a Manhattan department store dressing room in 1996.
Trump suffers hammer blow in his appeal against $5 million E. Jean Carroll sex abuse case
A federal appeals court upheld a New York jury’s guilty verdict finding President-elect Donald Trump liable in the E. Jean Carroll sex abuse and …
Courthouses to close for New Year’s holiday – North Dakota Court System
Benson County courthouse will close at noon on December 31st. For assistance, call Ramsey County at 701-662-1309. Renville County courthouse will …
Trump loses appeal in $5 million E. Jean Carroll defamation, sexual abuse case
The ruling by federal judges said Donald Trump did not demonstrate that the district court “erred in any of the challenged rulings.”
Appeals Court Upholds $5 Million Verdict Against Donald Trump in E. Jean Carroll Case
Appeals for new trial rejected. New York: A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a jury’s verdict that Donald Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll, …
Appeals court rejects Trump’s bid to overturn E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse verdict
Trump argued that his rights were violated by the judge presiding over the case, but the court disagreed.