Carroll, a former Elle magazine advice columnist and Hunter S. Thompson biographer, sued Trump in state court in Manhattan in November 2019 for his …
Month: December 2020
Clark County government building to move to new River Ridge site
Glover said moving to a new site frees up space for the existing building at 501 E. Court Ave. in Jeffersonville. “It will be a true judicial center.
California’s Trial Courts Are Enforcing Federal Forum Selection Clauses for Securities Act Claims
The court’s decision tracks the reasoning in Restoration Robotics and Uber and further solidifies FFPs as enforceable under California law.
New campaign launched against loan sharks as lenders move online to prey on Scots
DIGITALSCOTLAND – 28 October 2021. DIGITAL JUSTICE AND POLICING – 16 February 2021. CYBER SECURITY SCOTLAND – 23 February 2021
E‘town man accused of strangulation, kidnapping
… with Us! e-Edition · About Us · Contact Us · Personnel · Newspapers In Education · Calendar · Submit News · News · Local News · Crime and Courts …
SECTORAL IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON BUSINESS
… still are facing many challenges because of the lower court being closed and minimal functioning of higher courts through the E–court mechanism.
Chinese e-commerce platforms to be held responsible for safety of food products, Supreme Court …
E-commerce platforms in China can be held legally responsible for food safety issues related to products purchased on their platforms, China’s top court …
Teknikio Releases Tekniverse for K-12 Students to Collaborate in Building Remote or In-Person
It was designed for remote-learning, digital justice, and open-ended exploration. The boards are cost effective and durable, which is especially …
Taking on the tech titans: Reclaiming our data commons
What strategies, structures and institutions are needed at national and international levels to confront Big Tech and advance digital justice?
The Courts
Ditech Financial v. Terry L. Riggs, et al; motion by Ditech to reinstate lawsuit to the court docket is approved. Blaine E. Fields, et al, v. Ronald A.